3604 Risk Management Procedure
Procedure
Policy Name: Enterprise Risk Management
Policy Number: 3604
Applicable Code/Law: RCW 43.19.760, 43.19.763, RCW43.19.781, Executive Order 16-06, SAAM 20.20, NWCCU Accreditation Standard 2.E.2
DEFINITIONS
Enterprise risk management is the process of planning, organizing, leading, and controlling the activities of an organization in order to minimize the effects of risk. ISO 31000 is the international standard for the practice of risk management. It is an enterprise-wide approach that proactively identifies, assesses, and prioritizes strategic risks, followed by the allocation of resources to minimize, monitor, and control the likelihood and impact of risks occurring, or to maximize opportunities.
Executive owner is the executive team member who has oversight of the risk. This means that the risk resides in a division/program, etc. that the executive owner is responsible for.
Origami ERM Module is a list of identified risks, the risk rating and score of each risk, the current controls, treatment plan, risk metrics and who is accountable for managing the risk. This module, owned and maintained by the WA Department of Enterprise Services, allows Risk Officers a software solution to streamlining all ERM processes.
Risk identification means the process of identifying risks that might enable or impede the agency’s ability to provide its core mission services or meet its strategic objectives, i.e., brainstorming session.
Risk owner means the person with the authority and accountability for managing a particular risk.
Risk prioritization is the process of evaluating identified risks to determine the likelihood and impact of each risk, resulting in a risk score and rating.
PROCEDURE:
The college proactively identifies, assesses, and responds to risks that may affect our ability to provide our core mission services and the achievement of our strategic and performance-based objectives and their intended outcomes. The College uses a consistent, integrated, and transparent enterprise risk management (ERM) approach to support informed decision-making and resource allocation at both the strategic and operational levels.
The college will provide training and apply ERM best practices to identify and manage internal and external risk to protect students, employees, contractors, visitors, and college resources. ERM best practices will be used as an integral part of considering risk in the decision-making process through identifying risks and opportunities across all college divisions, facilities, programs, and areas of operation. Once a risk has been identified and prioritized, the college will develop, implement, and monitor risk treatment strategies.
The college will provide management support and commitment to safety and loss control, and develop awareness of ERM through education, training, and information sharing per RCW 43.19.760, the Governor’s Executive Order 16-06, and ISO 31000.
ROLES AND RESPONSIBILITIES
- President
- Leads, supports, and ensures commitment to implementing the ERM ISO 31000 Purpose, Principles, Framework and Risk Management Process.
- Establishes and communicates their risk appetite and the college’s risk tolerance to the Executive Team to support efficient and effective risk mitigation.
- Makes a commitment to adopting and integrating ERM into the organizational culture.
- Ensures appropriate allocation of resources given the financial and resource constraints to support risk management activities.
- Executive Team
- The executive team provides management support and commitment to ERM.
- The executive team will:
- Support an enterprise-wide commitment to risk management across the entire organization, from front line employees to management and from management to employees.
- Participate in risk identification and risk prioritization sessions at least annually.
- Risks will be prioritized at an enterprise-wide level by analyzing the likelihood and impact of each risk.
- Identify emerging risks and any significant changes to current risks.
- Ensure the reallocation of resources for managing risks.
- See page 4 of this policy for the method, timeline and scoring criteria used for identifying and prioritizing risks.
- Create a communication channel for risk owners of the highest scored risks to report on their risks at least annually to the executive team.
- Include risk consideration as an integral part of the organization’s decision-making process.
- Support education, training and information sharing on ERM policies and procedures to promote enterprise-wide awareness.
- Serve as executive risk owners for risks that fall within their purview.
- Executive Risk Owners
-
-
- For risks that fall within their purview, executive risk owners will work with risk owners to:
- Review, approve and support the implementation of risk mitigation strategies.
- Review mitigation strategy effectiveness for risks.
- Ensure the reallocation resources for managing risks.
- Create a communication channel for risk owners to report on their risks regularly.
-
-
- Risk Officer
- The Risk Officer coordinates and facilitates the enterprise-wide effort necessary to identify, evaluate, mitigate, and monitor the agency’s strategic/operational, legal/compliance, financial, reputational, health/safety and employment risks.
- The Risk Officer will:
- Develop ERM tools, practices, and processes to identify, analyze and report enterprise-wide, strategic risks according to this policy and the ISO 31000 ERM framework.
- The Risk Officer will, by using the Origami ERM module, monitor and facilitate the
management of risks by:
- Ensuring the completion of quarterly updates of the highest scored risks.
- Ensuring the completion of the semi-annual updates of identified risks.
- Ensuring the completion of the semi-annual prioritization of identified risks.
- Attesting to compliance with the Governor’s Executive Order 16-06 annually.
- Managing the risk register in the Origami ERM Module.
- Support employee awareness and understanding of ERM through education, training, and information sharing.
- Coordinate reporting on risk treatment activities by risk owners to the executive team as required.
- Report at least annually to the executive team on the management of risks, loss history, and emerging risks.
- Annually review and recommend revisions to the policy or procedure.
- Risk Owners
- Develop and implement mitigation plans and controls for assigned risks.
- Monitor assigned risks to ensure the mitigation strategies are controlling the risks.
- For risk owners with the highest scored risks:
- Update risks quarterly using the Origami ERM module as assigned by the Risk Officer.
- Report the status of assigned risks – controls, gap analysis, mitigation progress and risk metrics - to the executive team at least annually.
- For all other risks owners:
-
- Update risks at least annually using the Origami ERM module as assigned by the Risk Officer.
- Report the status of assigned risks – controls, gap analysis, mitigation progress and risk metrics - to the executive risk owner and/or executive team as needed.
-
- Managers and Supervisors
- Managers and supervisors apply ERM in all aspects of operations and actions.
- Managers and supervisors will:
- Set the standards and expectations of staff with respect to addressing risks.
- Ensure internal control processes are implemented, maintained, and monitored to manage risk.
- Support ERM training for all employees.
- All Employees
- All employees are responsible for understanding and supporting the agency’s efforts to identify, eliminate or manage risk.
- Employees will identify and communicate risks to their supervisor or the Risk Officer.
METHOD, TIMELINE AND SCORING CRITERIA FOR IDENTIFY AND PRIORITIZING RISKS
- Risk identification will occur in a brainstorming session with the executive team/leadership team. After the initial session, new risks will be identified in a brainstorming session at least annually, prior to the annual risk prioritization session.
- Risk Prioritization will occur after risks have been identified. WA Department of
Enterprise Services’ Origami ERM module ERM Plan will be used to prioritize (score)
the identified risks.
- Risks are scored by determining the likelihood of each risk occurring within the next
two years, and by determining the impact of the risk if it did occur.
- Likelihood and Impact are scored as shown below:
- Risks are scored by determining the likelihood of each risk occurring within the next
two years, and by determining the impact of the risk if it did occur.
Likelihood Scoring
|
Value |
Description |
| Very Unlikely (1) | 1 - Very Unlikely in the next 2 years |
| Unlikely (2) | 2 - Unlikely in the next 2 years |
| Likely (3) | 3 - Likely in the next 2 years |
| Very Likely (4) | 4 - Very Likely in the next 2 years |
| Certain (5) | 5 - Certain in the next 2 years or happening now |
Impact Scoring
|
Value |
Description |
| Very Little (1) | 1 - Very Little |
| Minor (2) | 2 - Minor |
| Moderate (3) | 3 - Moderate |
| Major (4) | 4 - Major |
| Critical (5) | 5 - Critical |
- All leaders score ALL risks. The likelihood scores are averaged, and the impact scores are averaged; then the average likelihood score is multiplied by the average impact score, resulting in a final risk rating and risk score between 1-25.
For example: 3.2 x 4.1 = Score: 13.12 and Rating: Medium
- The rating scale for risk scores is shown in the table below:
1-5
6-10
11-15
16-20
21-25
Low
Medium Low
Medium
Medium High
High
Approved
Reviewed and Approved by Executive Team: 07/21/2026