November 16 - November 29, 2007

Vol. 43, No. 4

Download the Current Issue (.pdf)

Ebbtide Home
Archives
Staff
SCC Home
Controversy kicks athleticism from spotlight in men’s soccer finale

PHOTO BY DENNIE CHONG

Players had to share the on-field spotlight with the referees in the men’s season finale.


by Lavi Aulck
Sports Editor


Controversy and poor sportsmanship overshadowed on-field play during the last game of the season for SCC’s men’s soccer team as a

1-0 loss to Edmonds Community College (EDCC) kept the Dolphins from reaching the playoffs.

In what was the final match of the season for both squads, thirdplace EDCC entered the game on November 3 with a one-point lead in the NWAACC North table over SCC. A win would have given SCC a third place standing in the division and the final spot in the NWAACC playoffs. A loss or draw for SCC, however, and EDCC would find itself in the playoffs with the third place finish.

The match’s early offensive efforts led to no avail. Instead, it was in the 67th minute that the game saw its only goal when the ball found a seam through SCC’s defense. EDCC’s Lowell Garret was able to place it past goalkeeper Evan Gaul. In about the 75th minute, SCC found its best chance at a goal when Hiroaki Takahashi’s near breakaway attack was met with an overaggressive counter from EDCC’s defense inside the top of the box, giving a penalty kick to SCC.

Takahashi was called on to take the kick and aimed left where it appeared as though EDCC keeper Chris St. John’s left hand deflected the ball off the crossbar and right back to Takahashi. With the keeper still recovering from his dive, Takahashi treated himself to a nearopen net and calmly placed the ball through the posts for what seemed to be the tying goal.

After initially letting the goal stand, however, Head Referee Manuel Soledad met with his linesmen and ruled to waive the goal off and instead call offsides on Takahashi, ruling that the keeper never touched the ball on the penalty. “If it hits the crossbar directly and the shooter gets the second touch, the shooter is offsides,” explained Soledad after the match.

The call sparked the tempers of many SCC players, particularly defensemen Dan Hyseni. Shortly after the penalty, Hyseni was shown two consecutive yellow cards for exchanging words with referees, resulting in his immediate ejection from the match. Following his second yellow card, an enraged Hyseni charged at Soledad near midfield but was restrained by teammates and taken to the SCC bench.

SCC Athletic Director Doug Palmer was more than disappointed in Hyseni’s actions. “It was very negative when our player got kicked out of the game and charged the referee. That was stupid,” Palmer said.

“You can’t do that; it was uncalled for. You can’t physically threaten anyone. Even if he just ran up to him and yelled in his face without touching him, it doesn’t matter. You can’t do those types of things.”

Hyseni, a sophomore, was regretful of his actions and believes that the intensity and significance of the game played a large part in what he did. However, he also believes that the referees should have done a better job considering the importance of the match. “I know I shouldn’t have charged the ref. I was just caught in the moment,” said Hyseni. “But the referee can’t make that kind of call in the most important game of the year. For [the ref] to do that and cut our hopes like that is not good at all.”

Following the incident, referees called a near-10 minute pause to the match as they tried to restore order and upon resuming, the match took a much more hostile tone as increased aggression from both squads resulted in a number of shoving matches breaking out on field. In one such scuffle, EDCC goalie Chris St. John head-butted a SCC player and was shown a yellow card, despite headbutting normally being met with an immediate red card. The game ended a few minutes later after the headbutt, with Edmonds owning the final score 1-0 and SCC players not shaking the referees’ hands.

Head Coach George Dremousis holds lingering doubts about what could have been. “You’d like to say that the refs got all the calls right and if Edmonds beats you, they beat you,” said Dremousis. “But when the referees appear to blow a crucial call and you lose 1-0 in a big game, you always wonder what could have happened.”

In addition to the significance of the game, Palmer believed that the fact that the referees reversed their call on the penalty kick also played a large part in the buildup of the controversy. “A very decisive call (on the penalty kick) and you’re done,” said Palmer. “If you allow talk to happen afterwards, it just stirs up the whole thing even more. When officiating, you could be wrong, but you have to sell your call; that’s what will keep the controversy down. [The referees] lost control during the last ten minutes of the game. I think up to the controversial call, it was acceptable.”

Soledad, however, believes that he and his colleagues were always in control of the game, even during the closing stages. “I don’t think we lost control,” said Soledad. “[The players] tried to blow the game up but we didn’t let them.”