February 29 - March 13, 2008

Vol. 43, No. 9

Download Current Issue (.pdf)

Ebbtide Home
Archives
Staff
SCC Home
Define ‘Christian’

ILLUSTRATION BY PHILIP KELLY


by Stephen Lennstrom
Staff Writer


I need to settle a hash. A recent edition of Newsweek magazine featured an article concerning Mitt Romney. The article said in effect that evangelical leaders (like Franklin Graham) had been chumming it up at the candidate’s house, apparently trying to feel out his religious beliefs (he is a Mormon).

There is of course, nothing wrong with a good chumming. However, such a public connection between Christian leaders and Romney could cause many people to draw a connection between Christianity and Mormonism. This was not the only confusion the article brought to my attention. Enter second hash: the religious right’s involvement with politics.

Therefore, I endeavored to write this article in order to clear up a couple of points:
1) Mormons are not Christians
2) It is not okay for religious leaders to back any politician.

First let’s clear up my biggest beef with the three most important differences between Mormonism and Christianity:
1) Mormons believe that God the Father is separate from Jesus and the Holy Spirit. Belief in the “Trinity” is central to the Christian religion. The Trinity is defined as the unity of three spiritual persons (Father, Son, and Holy Ghost) in one Godhead. For instance, Christians believe that Jesus (the Son) is God. This stuff was debated over fifteen hundred years ago, back then we just exiled the people who disagreed with us. Not so easy now.
2) To Mormons, the Book of Mormon has just as much if not more spiritual weight than the Bible. Christians have what is called a “closed canon” (nothing is added to or subtracted from the Bible). There are no “lost” Scriptures so the Book of Mormon has no weight for Christians.
3) Only Mormons will be able to enter the highest level of heaven that God has created. This just doesn’t make sense. Why on earth would Christians be considered Mormons if Christians couldn’t even reap the full benefit of their own religion?

It is impossible for two groups of people who have such extremely different views of the nature and will of God to be the same.

Then, there is the issue of any Christian leader backing any politician. The political arena can never, should never and (as long as we are sane) will never be the religious arena.

I strongly support the separation of church and state, but not for the state’s sake! I am concerned about the health of the church. When religious leaders start influencing votes for political candidates, there are red flags going up in my brain.

Who would be the first kind of person to use your influence for a while and then lose you? Definitely a politician. It’s not only that I don’t trust them. My dear reader, I have to emphasize something: The Christian church is bigger than the United States. Once our leaders start claiming “ownership” of a religion, it stops being a religion and starts becoming a policy. I don’t want America to be the Christian nation. I would rather it be the pagan nation. That way we would discover quickly who is truly a Christian, and who just wants to be popular.