English 101

Essay I Peer Review

Overview

This peer review may be a little different from ones you have done in the past. Often peer review means you read your classmate’s paper and make general comments like “It was good” or “Needs more descriptions.” Or, you might just focus on fixing errors like comma splices or misspelled words.

In this exercise, you will be using your classmate’s paper as a lever to improve the quality of your own paper, and vice-versa, using yours as a lever to raise up your classmate’s. The way you’ll do this is by comparing the two papers.

Furthermore, you will not be making unstructured, general comments. Instead, you will answer a few very specific questions below in order to help improve one specific aspect of the writing. Remember the syllabus: Writing is many things, and you cannot do them all at once. This peer review is about just one of those things. Don’t get sidetracked with other aspects of the writing.

Finally, you will not be fixing grammar, spelling or other mechanical problems, unless they are so severe that they prevent you from understanding the paper. Focus on content. Save the mechanics for later.

You may want to look at my reasons for using peer review under “Why Peer Review” on the class website, if you want a more in–depth explanation of my philosophy.

Organization

You will be writing about both your own paper and your classmate’s paper. Write your answers on separate sheets, one for your own paper and one for your classmate’s.

Instructions

Read the paper through once. Then, go back over it and answer the following questions, comparing your classmate’s paper to your own.

  1. Which paper has less detail?
  2. Which paper has details that are less relevant to its story? In other words, of the details that are there, which ones are not so closely related to the experience being described? A story that has just one detail might still have a more relevant detail than one that is full of details that don’t matter.
  3. Which paper uses moments that are less representative (typical) of the change being described? Each moment (before, during and after the change) should give the reader a clear picture of what the author was like at that time, by describing speech and behavior (specific actions) that are typical of them at that time. In other words, the moments should prove what the author was like. Decide which paper is less successful at picking examples to prove what the author was like.
  4. Finally, describe one thing your classmate’s paper does successfully that you could emulate in your paper.
  5. Write your answer on the sheet you keep for yourself.